open - Latest Comments in shadow girl

Re: shadow girl

Robin — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:31:18 -0000

I'm glad you're not allowing him to co-author your blog. He's annoying. I think I won't link myself here. He might show up at my mindless drivel.

You just keep going and thinking Aaron. I like to see what's inside your head.

Re: shadow girl

aaron — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:03:23 -0000

smiles!

Re: shadow girl

aaron — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:56:19 -0000

Again I say if this is in your opinion the worst blog site ever...then why have you posted over 50 times in the past week?

You seem to have a hidden agenda, or just wanting to debate for the sake of debate. Where is the encouragement in that? Where is the love in that? Where is Christ in that?

Thats it...you're no longer co-author of this blog site. It's been a good run.

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:19:01 -0000

What tone! Your mood has drastically shifted. Before you wanted me to keep reading and commenting, but now, you are getting frustrated with me. And if you're not looking for comments, why are you posting your "conversations with God"? Why not keep them private?

Re: shadow girl

aaron — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:28:36 -0000

what tone! Micah look up what eavesdrop means. I'm not looking for comments...again I think it's odd ANYONE comments. Seriously, look up what eavesdrop means and type it on your next comment for everyone to read.

Do you consider anyone on this blog a Christian? It seems you have something to say against everyone. You make me smile!!

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:44:42 -0000

Again, you're not making sense. What does a conversation have to do with your marriage? And you're wrong again, when he decides to make it public, yes it is to me. To "overhear a private conversation...whether or not theat conversation is permitted to be overheard..." *theat? And if it is permitted to be overheard, it is no longer a private conversation. You just ruined your own argument with your own words

Re: shadow girl

jonathan — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:32:37 -0000

eavesdrop means to overhear a private conversation...whether or not theat conversation is permitted to be overheard...it is still not a conversation TO you. Public display has nothing to do with direction or intent. I didn't marry everyone that was at my wedding...just my wife.

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:57:37 -0000

In fact, it becomes more to me than for me, maybe you should have said for me, you would have been more accurate.

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:50:54 -0000

Well, you're wrong, if he has given me "permission to eavesdrop" than it is to me. Just as it is to you and everybody else who has permission. His prayer with God is between him and God, but when publicly displayed (with permission to eavesdrop), it becomes "to" all of us. But good try

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:18:23 -0000

You're welcome. If what aaron said to God was meant only to be to God, why did he post it? Why did you read it? And I never said it was written to me alone, you did. But thanks for making this post at least a little understandable

Re: shadow girl

jonathan — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:16:13 -0000

I never said it wasn't written FOR you, I said TO you.

Re: shadow girl

jonathan — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:54:05 -0000

The fact aaron said "God you alone" and not "Micah you alone" gives me reason to say it wasn't written to you. Also thanks again for not answering the question asked.

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:43:41 -0000

He has already asked me, thanks for joining us

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:22:10 -0000

Right, so who can say it's not for me?

Re: shadow girl

aaron — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:14:47 -0000

"permission to eavesdrop" is what this entire blog is about. If you get something from listening to my conversations with God...then good for you.

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:59:25 -0000

"If it's data printouts than I can see why you would want it to end after the subject was stated" this doesn't make sense...I knew you would want to know what didn't make sense about your statement because of your pride that we addressed in our last blog session. Try using the word "then" instead "than" next time.

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:34:42 -0000

What are you talking about? You don't even make sense when you write. If it's not written to me, who was it written to? And I'm glad you felt the need to tell me you read books...

Re: shadow girl

jonathan — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:19:14 -0000

Sorry I haven't visited in awhile...as much as I enjoy yer guys blog I do have some other things I have to do. Micah, Do you read data printouts or books? If it's data printouts than I can see why you would want it to end after the subject was stated. But as for me, I read books. Also...I don't think it was written to you.

Re: shadow girl

jimmy paravane — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:07:48 -0000

It's very neighborly of you Aaron. (grin)

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:10:46 -0000

Good answer

Re: shadow girl

Robin Meadows — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:32:08 -0000

haha! Love your title change! You're too funny! Glad you're back. Praying that the girl learns to know God alone! ....oh, and Micah too! ; )

Re: shadow girl

aaron — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:24:18 -0000

Figured since you visit this "dumbest blog I've ever seen" so much, I needed to change the blog site title. It's kinda like what I say (no matter what it might be) everyone can count on you saying the complete opposite.

Re: shadow girl

Micah Daniels — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:07:36 -0000

What? You could have just as well left the story at "A beautiful young lady about Eighteen was out front." and then ended it with your beautiful, poetic, and supremely boring ending. The rest of the story doesn't make any sense with how you ended it. Did we need to know she was a prostitute to realize God knows her story and yours? Did it take that to make you realize God's omniscience? And how come you're sure about this, but not your own salvation?

Re: shadow girl

aaron — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:15:09 -0000

very much so!
The order has always been that way for me. I've got it all together....wow, maybe I don't

Re: shadow girl

jimmy paravane — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:47:28 -0000

I keep trying to tell you people. It's all about the subjective perception. (grin)
Don't you find the order of the questions fascinating?